Click HERE for Screenreader optimized version.

Recommendations

Transfer to the National Fund

In the following cas­e, a transfer to the National Fund of the Repub­lic of Austria for Victims of National Socialism for utilizati­on pursuant to ­Sec. 2 (1) item 2 of the Art Restitution Law was recommended:

 

Results from the 66th advisory board meeting ob May 3, 2013

 

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at.

These are the recommandations on the advisory board from May 3, 2013:

In the following case:
Parliamentary library
the advisory board adjourned his consultations.

 

 

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board on March 8th, 2013

 

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was recommended:

  1. Family archiv Rothschild (Austrian State Archives)
  2. Eduard Epstein (Museum of Military History)
  3. Dr. Marianne Schmidl (Albertina)
  4. Adella Feuer (Albertina)

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was not recommended:

  • Georg Grosz/Alfred Flechtheim (MUMOK)

In the following case:

  • Unknown provenance/Austro Daimler ADR (Technical Museum Vienna)

the Advisory Board adjourned his consultations.


 

 


Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board on November 30th 2012


All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was recommended:

1. David Goldmann
2. Erich Lederer
3. Oskar Pöller

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was not recommended:

Oskar Bondy


Oskar Bondy
David Goldmann
Erich Lederer
Oskar Pöller



Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of 12th October 2012

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at


The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs was respectively was recommended:

Valerie Karplus

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was not recommended:

Rudolf Gutmann

In the case of Oskar Bondy the Advisory Board adjourned his consultations.

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board on  June 29, 2012

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was recommended

Dr. Josef Blauhorn

 

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of 20th April 2012

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs was respectively recommended

  • Dr. Leon de Vaux
  • Dr. Siegfried Fuchs

In the case of Josef Blauhorn the Advisory Board postponed its deliberations.

 

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of 2nd March 2012

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs was respectively recommended

  • Friedrich Wolff-Knize
  • Dr. Stefan Poglayen-Neuwall
  • Serena Lederer (Elisabeth Bachofen-Echt)
  • Dr. Armin Reichmann

The restitution of object to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was not recommended

  • Alfred Hofmann
  • Valerie und Lotte Heissfeld
  • Dr. Robert Schwarz

 

 

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of

29th September 2011

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at

The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs was respectively recommended

Dr. Karl Banhans

Dr. Ernst Moriz Kronfeld

 

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of 10th June 2011


The restitution of objects to the owners or their rightful heirs respectively was not recommended:

Dr. Karl Banhans
Dr. Ernst Moriz Kronfeld

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 15th April 2011

All recommendations can be found at www.provenienzforschung.gv.at

In its 56th session of 15th April 2011, the Advisory Board recom­mended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitutions pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

In the following case, the restitution to the heirs or their legal successors was not recommended:

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 18th March 2011

In its 55th session of 18th March 2011, the Advisory Board cannot recom­mend to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitution pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 26th November 2010

In its 54th session of 26th November 2010, the Advisory Board recom­mended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitutions pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 8th Oktober 2010

In its 53rd session of 8th Oktober 2010, the Advisory Board cannot recom­mend to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitution pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 22nd September 2010

In its 52nd session of 22nd September 2010, the Advisory Board recom­mended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitutions pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

In the following case the Advisory Board postponed its deliberations:

  • Jenny Steiner

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 10th June 2010

In its 51st session of 10th June 2010, the Advisory Board recom­mended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitution pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

In the following case, the restitution to the heirs or their legal successors was not recommended:

In the following cases the Advisory Board postponed its deliberations until the next session:

  • Dr. Ludwig Neurath
  • Jenny Steiner

Recommendations in the session of the A­rt Restitution Advisory Board of 19th March 2010

In its 50th session of 19th March 2010, the Advisory Board recom­mended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitutions pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

In the following cases the Advisory Board postponed its deliberations until the next session:

  • Robert Schwarz
  • Jenny Steiner

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of 20th November 2009

In its 49th session of 20th November 2009, the Advisory Board recommended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitutions pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

In the following cases, the restitution to the heirs or their legal successors was not recommended:

Recommendations in the session of the Art Restitution Advisory Board of 11th September 2009

In its 48th session of 11th September 2009, the Advisory Board recommended to the Federal Minister for Education the Arts and Culture the following restitutions pursuant to Sec. 3 of the Art Restitution Law:

Due to the fact that the objects could not be identified, in the following cases it was recommended that - in compliance with the relevant budgetary provisions - the descendants be offered the transfer of individual pieces from tranches of equal value according to their type: